Tchaikovsky & Babajanian: Piano Trios / Gluzman, Moser, Sudbin
In Russian chamber music, a rather special tradition evolved around the piano trio, with a number of composers turning to the genre to write āinstrumental requiemsā. First out was Tchaikovsky with his Piano Trio in A minor, Op. 50, āĆ la mĆ©moire dāun grand artisteā, and he was followed by composers such as Rachmaninov, Arensky and Shostakovich. In the case of Tchaikovskyās trio, the āgrand artisteā was the pianist Nikolai Rubinstein, and Tchaikovsky chose the trio genre as he felt that a piece for solo piano would be too lightweight and one with orchestral accompaniment would be too showy. The work is in two movements, a Pezzo elegiaco (āelegiac pieceā) and a set of variations, and it begins with the cello playing a moving lament which sets the tone for the entire first movement. The theme returns at the end of the second movement in the form of an impassioned funeral march. Seventy years later, when the Armenian composer and pianist Arno Babajanian (1921ā83) wrote his Piano Trio in F sharp minor, he didnāt give it any subtitle, but thereās a grandeur and breadth of scale which rivals Tchaikovskyās work ā and the second movement is thoroughly elegiac in character. The trio is Babajanianās best-known work, composed in the Romantic style of Rachmaninov, but also rooted in Armenian folk music, melodically as well as rhythmically. Performing the two works are Vadim Gluzman and Yevgeny Sudbin, both with Russian roots, joined by cellist Johannes Moser, and the three close the album with Sudbinās arrangement of a brief Tango by Alfred Schnittke.
-----
REVIEW:
I will begin with what, strictly speaking, is merely the āother pieceā on this disc: the piano trio by Arno Babajanian. I have never heard of him or what appears to be his best-known work, but the outstanding recording and startling advocacy of this starry chamber group makes me think I should have.
The piano trio opens with the violin and cello playing a dark theme together. The piano comes in with some lovely runs reminiscent of Rachmaninovās second piano concerto (no bad thing, in my view). The second movement starts with a long violin melody over a syncopated piano accompaniment, not a million miles from Korngold or Prokofievās second violin concerto. The final movement opens with something of a shock, a jazzy passage in 5/8 time, but then the cello comes in with a lovely theme, and the two moods alternate until the end.
It is a delightful work with strong melodies and rhythmic complexity, which this trio plainly adore. It is wonderfully recorded, giving plenty of power to Johannes Moserās cello work. I shall be taking it off my shelves frequently.
I have so far had to make do for Tchaikovskyās Piano Trio opus 50 with an old Naxos recording by the Ashkenazy Trio (8.550467), still available. The coupling is Arenskyās trio, and I would not want to be without that. But this disc blows that version out of the water, both in terms of performance and recording. I cannot pretend to have heard all the hundreds of recordings of the work by world-renowned musicians which are out there ā but this well may be among the best.
Once again, the recording of Moserās cello has all the resonance of the real instrument; Sudbinās piano is alert but self-effacing when it needs to be; Gluzmanās violin soars and inspires. Above all, the trio give the impression they are listening to each other and adjusting their performances accordingly.
The disc ends with a little bon-bon which I assume the group put in because they were enjoying themselves so much: the Tango from the opera Life with an Idiot by Alfred Schnittke. It is not really necessary, since the disc lasts almost seventy minutes without it, but it is great fun, for us as well as for the artists.
ā MusicWeb International
Product Information
Product Information
Shipping & Returns
Shipping & Returns
Tchaikovsky & Babajanian: Piano Trios / Gluzman, Moser, Sudbin
Tchaikovsky & Babajanian: Piano Trios / Gluzman, Moser, Sudbin
In Russian chamber music, a rather special tradition evolved around the piano trio, with a number of composers turning to the genre to write āinstrumental requiemsā. First out was Tchaikovsky with his Piano Trio in A minor, Op. 50, āĆ la mĆ©moire dāun grand artisteā, and he was followed by composers such as Rachmaninov, Arensky and Shostakovich. In the case of Tchaikovskyās trio, the āgrand artisteā was the pianist Nikolai Rubinstein, and Tchaikovsky chose the trio genre as he felt that a piece for solo piano would be too lightweight and one with orchestral accompaniment would be too showy. The work is in two movements, a Pezzo elegiaco (āelegiac pieceā) and a set of variations, and it begins with the cello playing a moving lament which sets the tone for the entire first movement. The theme returns at the end of the second movement in the form of an impassioned funeral march. Seventy years later, when the Armenian composer and pianist Arno Babajanian (1921ā83) wrote his Piano Trio in F sharp minor, he didnāt give it any subtitle, but thereās a grandeur and breadth of scale which rivals Tchaikovskyās work ā and the second movement is thoroughly elegiac in character. The trio is Babajanianās best-known work, composed in the Romantic style of Rachmaninov, but also rooted in Armenian folk music, melodically as well as rhythmically. Performing the two works are Vadim Gluzman and Yevgeny Sudbin, both with Russian roots, joined by cellist Johannes Moser, and the three close the album with Sudbinās arrangement of a brief Tango by Alfred Schnittke.
-----
REVIEW:
I will begin with what, strictly speaking, is merely the āother pieceā on this disc: the piano trio by Arno Babajanian. I have never heard of him or what appears to be his best-known work, but the outstanding recording and startling advocacy of this starry chamber group makes me think I should have.
The piano trio opens with the violin and cello playing a dark theme together. The piano comes in with some lovely runs reminiscent of Rachmaninovās second piano concerto (no bad thing, in my view). The second movement starts with a long violin melody over a syncopated piano accompaniment, not a million miles from Korngold or Prokofievās second violin concerto. The final movement opens with something of a shock, a jazzy passage in 5/8 time, but then the cello comes in with a lovely theme, and the two moods alternate until the end.
It is a delightful work with strong melodies and rhythmic complexity, which this trio plainly adore. It is wonderfully recorded, giving plenty of power to Johannes Moserās cello work. I shall be taking it off my shelves frequently.
I have so far had to make do for Tchaikovskyās Piano Trio opus 50 with an old Naxos recording by the Ashkenazy Trio (8.550467), still available. The coupling is Arenskyās trio, and I would not want to be without that. But this disc blows that version out of the water, both in terms of performance and recording. I cannot pretend to have heard all the hundreds of recordings of the work by world-renowned musicians which are out there ā but this well may be among the best.
Once again, the recording of Moserās cello has all the resonance of the real instrument; Sudbinās piano is alert but self-effacing when it needs to be; Gluzmanās violin soars and inspires. Above all, the trio give the impression they are listening to each other and adjusting their performances accordingly.
The disc ends with a little bon-bon which I assume the group put in because they were enjoying themselves so much: the Tango from the opera Life with an Idiot by Alfred Schnittke. It is not really necessary, since the disc lasts almost seventy minutes without it, but it is great fun, for us as well as for the artists.
ā MusicWeb International
Original: $10.99
-65%$10.99
$3.85Product Information
Product Information
Shipping & Returns
Shipping & Returns
Description
In Russian chamber music, a rather special tradition evolved around the piano trio, with a number of composers turning to the genre to write āinstrumental requiemsā. First out was Tchaikovsky with his Piano Trio in A minor, Op. 50, āĆ la mĆ©moire dāun grand artisteā, and he was followed by composers such as Rachmaninov, Arensky and Shostakovich. In the case of Tchaikovskyās trio, the āgrand artisteā was the pianist Nikolai Rubinstein, and Tchaikovsky chose the trio genre as he felt that a piece for solo piano would be too lightweight and one with orchestral accompaniment would be too showy. The work is in two movements, a Pezzo elegiaco (āelegiac pieceā) and a set of variations, and it begins with the cello playing a moving lament which sets the tone for the entire first movement. The theme returns at the end of the second movement in the form of an impassioned funeral march. Seventy years later, when the Armenian composer and pianist Arno Babajanian (1921ā83) wrote his Piano Trio in F sharp minor, he didnāt give it any subtitle, but thereās a grandeur and breadth of scale which rivals Tchaikovskyās work ā and the second movement is thoroughly elegiac in character. The trio is Babajanianās best-known work, composed in the Romantic style of Rachmaninov, but also rooted in Armenian folk music, melodically as well as rhythmically. Performing the two works are Vadim Gluzman and Yevgeny Sudbin, both with Russian roots, joined by cellist Johannes Moser, and the three close the album with Sudbinās arrangement of a brief Tango by Alfred Schnittke.
-----
REVIEW:
I will begin with what, strictly speaking, is merely the āother pieceā on this disc: the piano trio by Arno Babajanian. I have never heard of him or what appears to be his best-known work, but the outstanding recording and startling advocacy of this starry chamber group makes me think I should have.
The piano trio opens with the violin and cello playing a dark theme together. The piano comes in with some lovely runs reminiscent of Rachmaninovās second piano concerto (no bad thing, in my view). The second movement starts with a long violin melody over a syncopated piano accompaniment, not a million miles from Korngold or Prokofievās second violin concerto. The final movement opens with something of a shock, a jazzy passage in 5/8 time, but then the cello comes in with a lovely theme, and the two moods alternate until the end.
It is a delightful work with strong melodies and rhythmic complexity, which this trio plainly adore. It is wonderfully recorded, giving plenty of power to Johannes Moserās cello work. I shall be taking it off my shelves frequently.
I have so far had to make do for Tchaikovskyās Piano Trio opus 50 with an old Naxos recording by the Ashkenazy Trio (8.550467), still available. The coupling is Arenskyās trio, and I would not want to be without that. But this disc blows that version out of the water, both in terms of performance and recording. I cannot pretend to have heard all the hundreds of recordings of the work by world-renowned musicians which are out there ā but this well may be among the best.
Once again, the recording of Moserās cello has all the resonance of the real instrument; Sudbinās piano is alert but self-effacing when it needs to be; Gluzmanās violin soars and inspires. Above all, the trio give the impression they are listening to each other and adjusting their performances accordingly.
The disc ends with a little bon-bon which I assume the group put in because they were enjoying themselves so much: the Tango from the opera Life with an Idiot by Alfred Schnittke. It is not really necessary, since the disc lasts almost seventy minutes without it, but it is great fun, for us as well as for the artists.
ā MusicWeb International